Saturday, September 16, 2006

Venice Architecture Biennale Tries to Tame the Mega-City

The ANNOTICO Report

 

Architecture, after spending much of the 1980s and early 1990s mired in obscure theory, and the last 10 years preoccupied with image, is moving into an encouraging period of engagement  with the future shape of rapidly metastasizing mega-cities, with politicians and developers, with poverty and with environmental destruction.

 

ARCHITECTURE REVIEW

TRYING TO TAME THE MEGA-CITY

The Architecture Biennale tackles the problems stemming from the great migration into cities.

Los Angeles Times

By Christopher Hawthorne
Times Staff Writer
September 15, 2006

The Architecture Biennale tackles the problems stemming from the great migration into cities.Venice, Italy

Paradigm shifts rarely emerge quite as dramatically as the one that dominates this year's Architecture Biennale in Venice. In the curatorial equivalent of capital letters, the exhibition announces what has become increasingly apparent to those in the field: that architecture, after spending much of the 1980s and early 1990s mired in obscure theory, and the last 10 years preoccupied with image, is moving into an encouraging period of engagement  with the future shape of rapidly metastasizing mega-cities, with politicians and developers, with poverty and with environmental destruction.

The show, which opened to the public on Sunday, is organized by Richard Burdett, a professor of urbanism and an advisor on architecture and planning to the mayor of London. His approach, heavy on i! nfographics and dramatic top-down photographs of 16 big cities around the world, including Los Angeles, leans rather far in the direction of digestibility. In the main part of the exhibition, covering half a dozen rooms in the old Venetian shipbuilding complex called the Arsenale, he manages to suggest both that urbanization is racing out of control and that its attendant problems are entirely solvable  and by architects, no less.

The result is something like a Brueghel or a Goya scene as painted by Wayne Thiebaud: all the emerging woes of the world's cities  desperate poverty, congestion, pollution  lined up in neat, brightly colored rows. Still, simply in its effort to grapple with such a massive and overtly political theme, the show easily distances itself from typical architecture exhibitions these days, which tend to be either hagiographic tributes to a single architect  often designed or curated by the architect herself  or facile exercises in trend-spotting.!

This is true not only in the sections arranged by Burdett but also in the national pavilions, which are organized by their host countries. The U.S. pavilion, curated by the editors of Architectural Record, includes winners of a competition for housing in post-Katrina New Orleans. The projects are most impressive for their earnest ambition. A design by the San Francisco firm Eight Inc. calls for a 12-story building into which prefabricated apartment units of various lengths can be slotted. Though it recalls Moshe Safdie's influential Habitat '67 project in Montreal, it also bears an unfortunate resemblance to the pictures of tiered shacks in Caracas, Venezuela, and Sco Paulo, Brazil, that Burdett shows elsewhere.

In its broad scope and determination to be Highly Relevant, the show leaves itself open to the complaint that it contains no architecture, or that it is merely a throwback to the optimistic mega-projects of the 1970s. There was plenty of griping along th! ose lines during the opening weekend from the more-jaded-than-thou set, which is always well represented at the Biennale. Yet the subject Burdett tackles here is, in many ways, the only subject for architecture at the moment: the human and planetary costs of the great migration into cities that is now taking place from Shenzhen, China, to Sco Paulo.

The statistics around which Burdett centered the exhibition lost little of their force despite the near mantra-like way they were repeated throughout the weekend. A century ago, 10% of the world's population lived in cities. That figure is now 50%. By 2050 it will be 75%. Precisely how this massive urbanization unfolds  how politicians, planners and architects wind up "settling these new arrivals," as Burdett put it, "in three-dimensional space"  will determine the stability of various regimes, particularly in Beijing, the pace of global warming and the state of the oil market.

Of course, the world's city-dwellers f! ace vastly different circumstances depending on whether they live in a London flat or in a tin-roofed shack they hammered together on the outskirts of Lagos, Nigeria.

One of the show's most compelling themes is the way it charts the rise of the city-state on the one hand and of its chaotic sibling, the mega-city, on the other.

The new city-state is a place more conversant in the language of global capitalism and economic and cultural "flows" than of nation or homeland. In other words, 21st century Tokyo has more in common with London and New York than with Nagoya. And there is a whole group striving mightily for membership in that class. The most fascinating are Dubai, Abu Dhabi and the other city-states that make up the United Arab Emirates, where quite a few of the world's most famous architects are now employed by leaders working feverishly to diversify their economies before their oil reserves run out.

The result of that effort is a new kind of urban p! lanning, one that combines celebrity architecture, autocratic power and a Las Vegas-style emphasis on spectacle. Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas, who curated a section of the show on the UAE, described Dubai, home to the Persian Gulf's most extravagant development projects, as "Disneyland crossed with Albert Speer."

In the mega-city, meanwhile, the problem is simply finding room  not to mention jobs or healthcare  for the rural residents who continue to pour into them by the day in massive numbers. Cities such as Caracas or Cairo are marked not only by underground economies but also a kind of underground urbanism, their central cores ringed by endless mid-rise developments put up quickly and haphazardly, without an architect, engineer or building inspector in sight. Those shantytowns often rise just next door to shiny gated communities for pockets of wealthy residents who, thanks to drivers, nannies, private schools and bodyguards, live entirely separate lives from their! struggling neighbors.

Los Angeles occupies a position somewhere in between these two poles, much closer to the city-state in its wealth and global influence but marked by stark class separation and unplanned growth. Still, there were hopeful signs for Angelenos in the recipe that Burdett and others laid out for urban revitalization. London, the city he knows best, has re-energized itself through a combination of aggressive planning policies  charging a "congestion fee" for driving into the center of the city during rush hour, for example  and significant incentives for developers.

With a dynamic mayor and residents increasingly receptive to the kind of aggressive policy changes that might loosen gridlock, particularly on the Westside, or extend the subway to the airports and beaches, Los Angeles seems as well positioned as any major American city to experiment with elements of the same approach.

And in a larger sense, Burdett's interest in engagement cl! osely tracks other heartening changes in architecture. These include the rise of groups like Architecture for Humanity, which works to build emergency housing and other architectural services for the poor, and the growing fluency among younger American architects in green design.

After a decade in which architects and their clients grew obsessed with image  as digital technology made the stunning two-dimensional rendering as powerful a force in the field as any completed building  the shift is overdue. After all, the lessons seem all too clear at the World Trade Center site, where the participation of the world's top architects failed to budge developer Larry Silverstein or Port Authority bureaucrats even an inch from entrenched positions. The rebuilding process there ought to be primarily remembered, at least in architecture, as a place where image took on power and was soundly routed.

Even if it is overly optimistic to think that architects will be crucial pl! ayers in the coming century of urban growth, there is something to be said for Burdett's effort to sharpen their savvy and help them keep a place at the table. They are going to need those skills in New Orleans, to name the most obvious American example.

The exhibition's major themes seemed not only to match the emerging zeitgeist, in both encouraging architects to be humble and suggesting an expanding role for them in shaping cities, but also seemed to rub off on the architects in attendance. Koolhaas and the Swiss architect Jacques Herzog, in a panel discussion with Burdett, barely spoke above a whisper and took turns deferring to one another. Both endorsed, with seeming sincerity, an architectural effort to slow global warming.

Still, the age of celebrity architecture has hardly run its course, as that very panel proved. Before it started, students, architects and locals gathered around the two entrances to the auditorium, clamoring and throwing elbows to get ! inside. Even if Koolhaas has morphed all of sudden into Nice Rem, he remains a superstar, at least in this particular constellation.

http://www.calendarlive.com/printedition/

calendar/cl-et-venice15sep15,0,7140274. story?coll=cl-calendar

 

 

The ANNOTICO Reports

Can be Viewed, and are Archived at:

Italia USA: http://www.ItaliaUSA.com (Formerly Italy at St Louis)

Annotico Email: annotico@earthlink.net