Sunday,
November 05, 2006
Eugenio Barba-
Legendary Theatre Reformer- Returns to
The
ANNOTICO Report
Eugenio
Barba has a place in the line of reformers that leads
from Stanislavski, Meyerhold, Craig, Copeau, Artaud, Brecht, Grotowski, to Peter Brook. But it isn't easy to define
his work. Any summary of his forty years of practical research in the theatre would
have to be grossly reductive. His interest has always been in unending process,
not in neat conclusions. His writing, rife with metaphor and myth, meanders
suggestively, but defies conceptualization.
Barba finished school in
To
attempt to characterize Barba, to start with, Barba refuses the traditional role of Western theater,
which is the interpretation of a written text. As with Grotowski,
the most a text can contribute is a theme for a "spectacle." This not
only excludes the writer from the theatre but, it seems, any psychological or
intellectual probing of a stage production. Realism in most senses of the word
is disdained, and we enter a larger than life world where the striking image
rules. Barba claims to avoid a specific
"style," but borrows with a free hand from avant-garde and
experimental theatre practice as well as from non-Western theatre.
Barba's prime interest lies in
the performer. His ultimate focus isn't on the spectator but the actor's craft,
in Grotowski's words, "the actor's ability to
fascinate, independent of context and meaning." The training of his actors
never ends, since an Odin Teatret
play, though performed, is never considered finished.
His
preference for centering attention on the performer and not the spectator has
had mixed results. A teacher might profitably limit his interest to the
creative process of actors. But a theatre director who leaves the spectator out
of the equation has chosen the wrong profession. The us/them
state of mind can lead to complacency among the clan of initiates. So can the
idea of a company of actors as a self-sufficient mini society. Inadequate
rehearsal time is the bane of contemporary theatre. But the Odin's habit of
rehearsing a play for years and never declaring it finished recalls the bad
habit of Etienne Decroux. The great mime -- and theoretician -- would stop his performance and repeat an
action again and again until he -- never mind the public -- felt it was right.
Yet the
Odin Teatret is a remarkable company, never slap dash
or less than interesting. Like all real beauty, its brand is sharp as a razor
and always tinged with magic.
To the Drama
minded, the entire article is fascinating, and mind expanding. You will never
look at Theatre the same again.
Swans
by Peter Byrne
November
6, 2006
Eugenio Barba came back to the heel of
Barba's Odin Teatret
based in
Third
tier cities like
A
freight car would be needed to bring home Eugenio Barba's
theatrical baggage. He finished school in
No one
would question that Barba has a place in the line of
reformers that leads from Stanislavski to Peter Brook through Meyerhold, Craig, Copeau, Artaud, Brecht, and Grotowski.
But it isn't easy to define his work. Any summary of his forty years of
practical research in the theatre would have to be grossly reductive. His
interest has always been in unending process, not in neat conclusions. His
writing, rife with metaphor and myth, meanders suggestively, but defies
conceptualization. All the same, discussion constrains us, while offering
apologies, to characterize his viewpoint as best we can. To start with, Barba refuses the traditional role of Western theater,
which is the interpretation of a written text. As with Grotowski,
the most a text can contribute is a theme for a "spectacle." This not
only excludes the writer from the theatre but, it seems, any psychological or
intellectual probing of a stage production. Realism in most senses of the word
is disdaine d! , and we enter a larger than life
world where the striking image rules. Barba claims to
avoid a specific "style," but borrows with a free hand from
avant-garde and experimental theatre practice as well as from non-Western
theatre.
Barba's prime interest lies in
the performer. His ultimate focus isn't on the spectator but the actor's craft,
in Grotowski's words, "the actor's ability to
fascinate, independent of context and meaning." The training of his actors
never ends, and to his mind ought to constitute a way of life. Indian examples
especially have brought Barba to an extremely
physical theatre. This goes beyond simple agility, and his actors work at
anchoring bodily expression in the deeper emotions. One critic says that Barba's actors "create the text with their
bodies." But this only happens after a complex process, which, again,
never stops, since an Odin Teatret play, though
performed, is never considered finished.
So work
on a play begins, not with a text, but with selected themes. These form the
basis for improvisations, which are less aimed at interaction between the
actors than at immersion in the thematic material. Among theatrical reformers Barba stands out for emphasizing the actor's personal
"trouvailles" and not merely group
integration. Only very late in the long rehearsal period does the play come
together. Not till then can some sort of script be written.
A
theatergoer wary of theory really had no choice in
The
ANNOTICO Reports
Can
be Viewed, and are Archived at:
Italia
Italia Mia: http://www.ItaliaMia.com
Annotico
Email: annotico@earthlink.net