Sunday,
November 26, 2006
Do Italian Americans have ANY Civil Rights??: An Overview
The ANNOTICO
Report
An Open Letter to
NIAF, OSIA, and UNICO,
An Informational
Copy to Ted Grippo of Grippo
& Elden, of Chicago, the chief campaigners against "The Sopranos"
and "Fuggedaboudit".
I fully
understand the Extreme Reluctance of Courts to engage in the Stifling of Free
Speech in the form of Prior Restraint as in TROs
(Temporary Restraining Orders) or Injunctions, and I was duly pessimistic as to
the Attempt to do so.
But, Why are we not pursuing a Law Suit for Damages????
Is it what you consider a weak Legal Basis, or a lack of Funds
???
Let me pursue the
Legal Basis. Does the Italian American Community have recourse under the 14th
Amendment, regarding the equal
protection of the laws. Are there not
Federal laws in effect that prevent the Defaming or Negative
Stereotyping of any Racial, Religious, or Ethnic Group by EITHER
Individuals, Organizations/ Businesses, or State action? Is there Not an arbitrary and selective application of those laws????
In this
(1) is this Not the STATE Board of Education involved as an arm
of State Government? and also,
(2) are
(3) the Illinois Constitution, Article 1,
Section 20, provides: Individual Dignity. To promote individual dignity, communications that portray
criminality, depravity or l! ack of virtue in,...
a...group of persons by reason of or by reference to religious, racial, ethnic,
national or regional affiliation are condemned.
(4) is there not a HostileWork/Learning Environment ??
(5) Harassment, in gender
cases has been proved merely by posting of Nude Photos
So, is there Not
basis on both a Federal and State Basis to pursue Damages against the School
District, and the successive Bureaucratic levels upward, all the way to the
Illinois State Board of Education, and even the Federal Dep't of
Education, to not only have Regulations instituted to Prevent a
Reoccurrence, But also to Institute a Remedial Program to counter balance
the effects of Media onslaught on School Kids?
Yes, I know
that this is a matter that Italian American Lawyer Organizations throughout the
Country SHOULD be addressing, but they are
too busy looking after the advancing of their own careers, by networking for
business, or getting elected to a Judgeship, or being close to those who are
elected Judges, to curry favor. Sad!
What is the
Appropriate and Most Effective Action, ignoring the practicalities of Cost for
the moment??????
A civil right is
an enforceable right or privilege, which if interfered with by another gives
rise to an action for injury. Examples of civil rights are freedom of speech,
press, assembly, the right to vote, freedom from involuntary servitude, and the
right to equality in public
places.
Discrimination
occurs when the civil rights of an individual are denied or interfered with because
of their membership in a particular group or class. Statutes have been enacted
to prevent discrimination based on a persons race,
sex, religion, age, previous condition of servitude, physical limitation, national origin and in some
instances sexual preference.
The most
important expansion of civil rights in the
During the
"reconstruction era" that followed Congress enacted numerous civil
rights statutes. Many of these statutes are still in force today and protect
individuals from discrimination and from the deprivation of their civil rights.
[However those statutes dealt mainly with actions of the STATE.]
The most
prominent civil rights legislation since reconstruction is the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 that extended the protection from Discrimination of INDIVIDUALS
using the Congressional Powers relating to
Interstate Commerce and Public Establishments that had a Connection to or was
Supported by the State. Public establishments include places of public
accommodation (e.g., hotels, motels, trailer parks),
restaurants, gas stations, bars, taverns, and places of entertainment in
general. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and subsequent legislation also declared
a strong legislative policy against discrimination
in public schools and colleges which aided in desegregation.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in federally funded programs.
The judiciary,
most notably the Supreme Court, plays a crucial role in interpreting the extent
of the civil rights, and the federal courts were/are crucial in mandating and
supervising school desegregation programs and other programs established to
rectify state or local discrimination.
State
constitutions, statutes and municipal ordinances provide further protection of
civil rights.
The
ANNOTICO Reports
Can
be Viewed, and are Archived at:
Italia
Italia Mia: http://www.ItaliaMia.com
Annotico
Email: annotico@earthlink.net