Tuesday,
September 11, 2007
ADL Foxman Claims
"Jewish Lobby" in DC Just like Italian Americans and Others ?????
The
ANNOTICO Report
Mr.
Foxman PLEASE Identify the
leaders of the Italian
American Lobby in DC? It is NON Existent!!! Where
is your head ????
Secondly,
When has ANY Italian American Group Lobbied for the Interests of Italy
??????? What are you talking about.
!!!??????
That
DOES come close to Divided Loyalties, especially when
I
am in total Agreement with Professor Judt, the
New York University professor, who decided to stop donating to the ADL when it
became clear to me that the ADL was more interested in identifying and
attacking critics of Israel (and NOT even handed debate),
and LESS interested in fighting hatred, racism or intolerance,"
With
one caveat: Foxman IGNORES hatred, racism or intolerance vs
any Group other than Jews. For example his latest deplorable stance on the
Armenian Genocide, and he has NEVER come to the defense of the Italian
American Community., and the Incessant and Non stop
Negative Depictions.
Foxman is a Super Hypocrite!!!!!
Confronting “
Book:
"The
Stephen
Walt, of Harvard's
John
Mearsheimer of
The
By
Seth Gitell
September 10, 2007
For people who
say their ideas can't get heard, those who contend "the Israel Lobby"
has a poisonous grip on American foreign policy are getting a lot of airtime
these days.
Stephen Walt,
co-author of "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," appeared on
National Public Radio's "Fresh Air" on Tuesday. Another NPR program,
"On Point," featured Mr. Walt of Harvard's Kennedy School of
Government and his writing partner, John Mearsheimer
of the
Into this
environment steps the national director of the Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, whose new book, "The Deadliest Lies: The
Israel Lobby and the Myth of Jewish Control," attempts to counter the
allegations and claims, errors and hyperbole of "the Israel Lobby"
set. Mr. Foxman, who spent his early years in
"A
classic anti-Semitic canard about Jews, having disproportionate power and
control, that Jews only care about themselves, has now been brought into
mainstream
For Mr. Foxman, the current arguments have an ugly resonance given
the historical context: He cites the Dreyfus Affair, Hitler's allegations that Jews
undermined the German effort in World War I, and Stalin's doubts about
Jewish loyalty as significant precedents to the recent charges. "To
survive Hitler and to survive postwar communist Europe and to relive these
hideous canards, just because they're being paraded by professors with titles
from
At stake, says Mr. Foxman, is
the ability of Jews to engage in American democracy as citizens, much like
Irish Americans, Cuban Americans, Italian Americans and members of other ethnic
groups. "Will Jews be less willing to act out their
full citizenship on issues for fear of being accused of being disloyal or
not loyal enough or more loyal to
"The
Deadliest Lies," which Mr. Foxman hopes will
find its way onto academic reading lists that include the books addressed in
his account, provides a litany of errors and illogicalities in the works it
disputes. Among the offenses: the "denigration" by Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer of Israel's offer to Yasser
Arafat at Camp David in 2000; their "minimization" of
Palestinian-Arab terror attacks on Israeli civilians; their account of the
demise of Senator Charles Percy of Illinois, the only politician they believe
was forced out of office by the "Lobby," in an electoral defeat
that Mr. Foxman attributes instead to the power of
Chicago's Democratic machine; and numerous examples, omitted from the work of
Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer, of American
administrations acting in opposition to Israel and its advocates.
Regarding Mr.
Carter, Mr. Foxman quotes Kenneth Stein, a former
aide to the president, to dispute the former president's assertion that Menachem Begin ever made any commitment during Camp David
discussions on settlements in the
Mr. Shultz goes
even further in refuting the idea that any "Israel Lobby" dictates
American foreign policy, enumerating
In addition to
addressing the arguments in a point-by-point fashion, Mr. Foxman's
book identifies a possible agenda behind the work of Messrs. Waltand Mearsheimer. "Their
goal is to identify and target a scapegoat for what they consider the mistaken
decision to invade
A significant
portion of the book involves the circumstances of the Polish consulate's
decision to cancel a speech by Mr. Judt last year, a
story broken by the Sun's Ira Stoll. To advocates of the "
The inquiry had
consequences for Mr. Foxman. A consulate employee
incorrectly told the director of Network 20/20, under whose auspices Mr. Judt was to speak, that the vice consul was speaking with
Mr. Foxman, he writes. From this, the Network 20/20
director surmised that the ADL was behind the cancelation,
and informed Mr. Judt, who sent a broadcast e-mail
blaming the group. Mr. Foxman became the focal point
for the controversy and the subject of two open letters, one in Archipelago,
the other in the New York Review of Books, the signatories of which refused to
hear his version of the facts before signing their names to it.
Most hurtful to
Mr. Foxman is Mr. Judt's
characterization of him and another Jewish leader as "illiberal lying
bigots fascists" in an e-mail
circulated in the heat of the fracas and published in press accounts at the
time. In a May 25, 2007, letter to Mr. Judt, Mr. Foxman wrote, "I am deeply disappointed that, as a
scholar of European history, you would use the term fascist' so
carelessly. I have devoted my entire professional life at ADL to fight hatred,
intolerance and anti-Semitism and have consistently defended free speech as a
bedrock principle To compare me to
the likes of Hitler, Mussolini and other authoritarian ideologues is not only personally offensive to me, but it
denigrates the memory of the countless victims of their bigotry and
violence."
In a May 30 reply
supplied to the Sun by Mr. Judt, the
Mr. Foxman contends that all three episodes his book addresses
are linked. "Both Mearsheimer-Walt and Carter
make the charge that you cannot tell the story, because Jews stifle debate. And
Tony Judt is an example of how that's used," he
said. "The only thing that I find so sad is that we still have to argue
and debate and answer some of the classical anti-Semitic canards."
Mr. Gitell (gitell.com) is a contributing editor of The
The
ANNOTICO Reports Can be Viewed (and are Archived) on:
Italia
Italia
Mia: http://www.ItaliaMia.com (3 years)
Annotico
Email: annotico@earthlink.net