Return to Previous Page
Fri 3/4/2011 
Italian Language is a Powerfully Aggregating Factor 

On the Re Unification of Italy, "Now that Italy was established, Italians had to be created". Regionalism was rampant, and dialects reigned supreme, and it was not until National TV became engrained did Italian (Tuscan-Dante)  become more unified, but there are still serious Regionalism, and Italy only becomes REALLY Unified during The World Soccer Cup , and the Olympics.   


"Italian is a Powerfully Aggregating Factor": Dardano
Esteemed linguist says dialects can be a dividing factor among people
Tandem; By Letizia Tesi ; March 6, 2011  

Fatta l?Italia, si dovevano fare gli italiani (Now that Italy was established, Italians had to be created). And once the national conscience was instilled, during the long post-unification period, the linguistic one should have been as well. One hundred and fifty years after Unification, it?s now a given fact, recognized by all linguists, although at times our linguistic identity totters behind banners of localism and political exploitation. According to Maurizio Dardano ? one of the top Italian linguistics and a language history professor at Sapienza (university in Rome) ? however, we can rest assured. 

?Notwithstanding appearances, I believe that the language is a powerfully aggregating factor,? says the linguist. ?Even if at times there are reactions on behalf of dialectics or localisms, everyone recognizes the use of Italian which as over the past few decades become a adaptable, modern tool, similar to other languages of Western Europe, very different than the literary Italian of a century ago.?

Does political exploitation of dialects exist?
?Yes, there has been in these past few years. As has happened in the past, dialect becomes an instrument of contention that serves to put one community or region at odds with another. At the base of all this politicization of these dialects is, however, a substantial ignorance of linguistic facts. For example, there are persons who claim to write in the vocabulary of the Lombard language, pretending to ignore that in Lombardy there is no one dialect, but that there are several, and they?re also very different from one another.?

So you?re against teaching dialect in schools?
?Abosulutely yes, because dialect must be safeguarded through other hubs. There?s no time in school to deal with such a complex issue, and anyways I ask myself who there is able to provide adequate instruction in dialect. An intolerable localism would be created: the teacher of Lombard (dialect) would have to be a Lombard just like the one teaching Campania dialect would have to be born in Campania. There are other things to be done in school: there?s the science culture, for example, for which Italy has remained behind with respect to the West and it?s a situation that needs to be addressed as soon as possible.?

Do you feel the Gelmini reform will resolve anything?
?The Gelmini reform has put a bit order in the universities. It cleared the bush that had become too thick in recent years. As far as high school, we?ll see.?
In short, it?s a useful reform?
?All in all, yes. Of course there are things that need to be dealt with further and corrected, but compared to the previous situation, I can?t but give a moderately positive assessment. Nothing had been done for many years and now attempts are being made to establish a bit of order. The main problem remains, however, the lack of funding that in the Post-War period has been earmarked for education.?

Let?s stay with that idea regarding funding for culture. Last year there was an erosion in funding destined for the promotion of Italian abroad.

?Yes and they should have saved on many other budget items. Mostly, we have a political class of completely unruly administrators, and that?s where we should be making the first cost cutting. For example, with the establishing of the Regions (level of government), it was said that the Provinces would be abolished, but instead that didn?t happen they?re centres of political power. But that?s just one example of missing out on thrift in areas where it could have been done ? among other things to the advantage of the functioning of the State machine.?

What do you think of the idea of creating a language museum?
?It?s an optimal idea. One could even consider an itinerant museum that travels to places where there are Italian communities. It shouldn?t be, though, a static museum, but a dynamic one that avails itself of the most modern means of communication In other words, a museum that?s not too museum-like and that is suitable for the times.?

Professor, what condition is Italian in?
?I?m at the mid-way point between those who say it?s doing very well and those who say it?s in bad shape. The Italian language today is spoken by all Italians ? 
that wasn?t the case 60 or 70 years ago, before the last world war. As with all growing phenomena, there are also negative aspects. In this case, a certain literature weakness is revealed, which occurs especially in school, and a certain exuberance of useless Anglicisms that are heard in the spoken language, read in newspapers, and which we could easily do without, also because Anglicism in Italy is only the result of laziness. In school ? having become more common, there?s an increase in the typical phenomena: defective phrasing, shaky syntax, and unclear lexicon in the written word.?

What is the most widespread mistake that ?offends? your ear as language expert?
?The main defect in the language of the youth is inadequacy: not knowing how to choose the wording and expressions that should be used in a certain context. For example, during an exam a student told me: ?La ragazza di Dante si chiamava Beatrice? (?Dante?s girlfriend was called Beatrice?). That?s ridiculous. Another student wrote that Cervantes, during a certain period of his life, was without ?grana? (?scratch?), meaning money. Those are things that make one laugh. The youth make these mistakes because they were educated by TV, by Big Brother, so they don?t have a lexicon that is flexible and suitable for various situations. And one can talk of consecutio temporum (an Italian grammar rule inherited from Latin), of pleonastic pronouns (redundancy), and of this famous subjunctive that is commonplace.?

Maybe we don?t read enough today?
?That?s for sure. Thirty-nine percent of the Italian population does not read books ? that is, they stay away from print and their cultivation comes only through TV or other media of this type. And it?s a very huge defect. Even if one reads more with respect to the past, there?s always a huge disconnect: there?s the preference of watching the newscast and not to read the dailies.?

Do you think it was the language of TV or of politicians to influence the spoken language?
?It?s difficult to generalize. There are better-written dailies and others that are less satisfying. The in-depth articles are usually written by those who know how to hold a pen, while in the current events, linguistic improvisations often reign supreme. There are certain characteristics in our press that differentiate us from other countries of the Western world: excessively loud headlines, excessive use of spoken expressions. Maybe that also occurs in the Anglo-Saxon world, but I don?t think to the extent it manifests itself in Italy. Another long-standing defect is the excessive commentary on news. Ours is a strongly ideological press and at times it?s the descriptive technique itself that?s defective.?

Can a standard be identified?
?I?ll answer with another question: What books would you suggest as required reading in school? At one time, there were the classics, from Manzoni to Verga to Pirandello. There are some very popular writers today, but who cannot be suggested to youth due to their idiosyncracies. I?ll give you an example: Can you imagine an essay written in Sciascia?s manner? That?s highly improbable because despite being a great writer, he is not a viable example of day-to-day writing. There are other writers that are models of language, such as Calvino. My advice would be to carefully read certain editorials of the well-written dailies that offer a usable model of Italian. To answer your question: a norm, yes, it exists, but it?s a silent norm, one that no longer responds, as it did 50 or 60 years ago, to scholastic models imposed from high up.? 

 http://www.tandemnews.com/viewstory.php?storyid=11032
 
 
 

The ANNOTICO Reports Can be Viewed (With Archives) on:
[Formerly Italy at St Louis]