
Sun 8/7/2011
$65 BILLION of 158 F-22 NEVER
Flew a Combat Mission for TWENTY YEARS
F-22 won the
final go-ahead from Congress in 1991, thanks in part to a lobbying campaign
by the plane's manufacturer, Lockheed Martin Corp. " then Lockheed Corp."
and its near 1,100 subcontractors in 44 states.
"The Cold War was over, it didn't
make any sense to go forward with the program," said Thomas Christie, a
retired official who worked 50 years at the Pentagon. "But the Air Force
built up such a large constituency up on the Hill that it couldn't be killed."
The fleet of 158 F-22 planes " costing
$412 million each" (TRIPLE what it was BUDGETED) has never entered
combat !!!!!!!!!!!
The F-35 is smaller than the F-22
and will be used jointly by the Navy, Marines and Air Force. The Pentagon
plans to buy 2,457 F-35s.
You think we could push back against
the Military _Industrial Complex that Eisenhower , that Great Socialist
warned.
You want to Pick on the Homeless,
Jobless, and IGNORE 65 BILLION in Military/Government WASTE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
High costs, malfunctions plague F-22
Raptor fighter Jets
The fleet of 158 F-22 planes ? costing
$412 million each ? has never entered combat and has been grounded since
May 3 because of a government safety investigation. The probe follows more
than a dozen incidents in which oxygen was cut off to pilots, a problem
suspected of contributing to at least one fatal accident
Los Angeles Times: Los Angeles Times;
August 6, 2011
It's the most expensive fighter jet
ever built. Yet the F-22 Raptor has never seen a day of combat, and its
future is clouded by a government safety investigation that has grounded
the jet for months.
The fleet of 158 F-22s has been sidelined
since May 3, after more than a dozen incidents in which oxygen was cut
off to pilots, making them woozy. The malfunction is suspected of contributing
to at least one fatal accident.
At an estimated cost of $412 million
each, the F-22s amount to about $65 billion sitting on the tarmac. The
grounding is the latest dark chapter for an aircraft plagued by problems,
and whose need was called into question even before its first test flight.
The sleek, diamond-winged fighter
was conceived during the Cold War in the early 1980s to thump a new generation
of Soviet fighter jets in dogfights. But with the collapse of the Soviet
Union, the Soviet fighters that the U.S. military planners feared never
moved beyond development and were never built.
Now, while other U.S. warplanes pummel
targets, the F-22 has sat silently throughout battles in Afghanistan. It
has gone unused in Iraq. There has been no call for it in the conflict
above Libya.
"For all that gigantic cost, you have
a system you can't even use," said Winslow T. Wheeler, a defense budget
specialist and frequent Pentagon critic at the Center for Defense Information.
"It's a fundamental explanation on how the country has gotten itself in
the financial mess that it's in today."
Designed in Burbank and built in Marietta,
Ga., the F-22 won the final go-ahead from Congress in 1991, thanks in part
to a lobbying campaign by the plane's manufacturer, Lockheed Martin Corp.
? then Lockheed Corp. ? and its near 1,100 subcontractors in 44 states.
"The Cold War was over, it didn't
make any sense to go forward with the program," said Thomas Christie, a
retired official who worked 50 years at the Pentagon. "But the Air Force
built up such a large constituency up on the Hill that it couldn't be killed."
The Air Force wanted an engineering
marvel with unmatched features of any other aircraft. Lockheed Martin delivered.
F-22 engines have thrust-vectoring
nozzles that can move up and down, making the plane exceptionally agile.
It can reach supersonic speeds without using afterburners, enabling the
plane to fly faster and farther. It's also packed with cutting-edge radar
and sensors, allowing the pilot to identify, track and shoot an aircraft
before the enemy pilot can detect the F-22.
"The Air Force piled it all on," said
Pierre Sprey, an aeronautical engineer who helped design the F-16 and A-10
jets. "It became a vehicle to carry a laundry list of technologies. The
plane is a textbook case on the dangers of complexity."
As the Air Force saw more opportunities
for design changes, the F-22 grew in cost. When the plane first entered
service in 2005, it didn't take long for problems to arise.
In 2006, an F-22 pilot was stuck in
the plane on the ground for five hours because the canopy wouldn't pop
open. Firefighters had to cut the pilot out. A replacement canopy cost
about $71,000, the Air Force said.
In 2007, a software error in the navigational
systems caused 12 F-22s to turn around from a flight to Okinawa, Japan,
from Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii. Six days later, engineers
corrected the error at a cost of between $200,000 and $300,000, the Air
Force estimated.
Last year, the fighters were inspected
for rust corrosion "due to poorly designed drainage in the cockpit," according
to the House Armed Services Committee. Fourteen F-22s had rusting parts
in the cockpit replaced, the Air Force said.
Corrosion has also been an issue with
the plane's radar-evading skin, which, the U.S. Government Accountability
Office said, is "difficult to manage and maintain, requiring nearly twice
the number of maintenance personnel as anticipated."
The plane takes about 3,000 people
to maintain, the Air Force said. The service calculated that for every
hour in the air, the F-22 spends 45 hours undergoing maintenance.
Two decades ago, the U.S. government
planned to buy 648 of the fighters for $139 million apiece; the cost has
almost tripled since then to $412 million, the Government Accountability
Office said.
Recently retired Defense Secretary
Robert M. Gates ended the purchase in 2009 at 188 planes, only a handful
of which are still being built. The $273-million increase per plane translates
to $51.3 billion in lost buying power for the F-22 program.
"The reality is we are fighting two
wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the F-22 has not performed a single
mission in either theater," Gates told a congressional panel in 2008.
Air Force officials said the F-22
hasn't been used in conflicts because its technology wasn't needed. They
added that all aircraft have problems that crop up, and that the F-22 is
worth the high price tag because it is the "most advanced fighter aircraft,
with unrivaled capabilities."
"The aircraft was designed for high-threat
environments, not what we've seen in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya," said
Lt. Col. E. John Teichert, who until recently commanded the F-22 squadron
at Edwards Air Force Base. "If the F-22 prevents a military engagement
with another country, it is well worth the money."
Even though the F-22 has never been
sent over a war zone, it has experienced seven major crashes with two casualties
? one of which may have been linked to the oxygen malfunction.
Capt. Jeff Haney, 31, was killed in
a F-22 after a crash in the Alaskan wilderness in November near Joint Base
Elmendorf-Richardson. An ongoing Air Force investigation is examining the
oxygen system as part of its probe.
The Air Force said the order in May
to keep the planes grounded was caused by 14 instances since June 2008
in which pilots experienced sickness related to bad oxygen flow.
The Air Force said its investigation
into the accident and oxygen problems "is currently scheduled to be completed
and delivered to the secretary of the Air Force this coming fall."
The oxygen system problems have compelled
the government to examine its forthcoming F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which
is also made by Lockheed. The F-35 is smaller than the F-22 and will be
used jointly by the Navy, Marines and Air Force. The Pentagon plans to
buy 2,457 F-35s.
John P. Jumper, a retired Air Force
general, former Air Force chief of staff to President George W. Bush and
fierce backer of the F-22 program, said the F-22 problems need to be resolved
soon so the planes and pilots return to service.
"It's very troublesome," he said.
"This is the sort of thing that deserves a thorough examination so it never
can happen again."
william.hennigan@latimes.com
The ANNOTICO Reports Can be
Viewed (With Archives) on:
[Formerly
Italy at St Louis]
|