You must have really first thought that the son was disabled, Right??

No, Parents must support a 30 yr old able bodied son, until he gets job, 
not only a job to his liking, but a job that fits his aspirations. The son has 
turned down several job offers, has a $200,000 Trust Fund, and lives in a 
"tony" part of town.   Hmmm!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COURT RULING MAKES ITALIAN PARENTS QUAKE 
Reuters Limited
Friday, April 5, 2002      

ROME (Reuters) - In a ruling that has sent a shiver down many parents' 
spines, Italy's highest appeals court has decreed that fathers must carry on 
supporting adult children until they find a job to their liking. 

Psychologists warned that the decision could discourage people from having 
children in a country whose birthrate is already one of the lowest in the 
world, while commentators said it could boost Italy's already high 
unemployment rate. 

The case revolves around a wealthy family in the southern city of Naples, 
where the father is still paying some $680 a month in maintenance to a son 
who is in his 30s and has a university law degree. 

The son also has a trust fund worth some $220,000, lives in one of the 
smartest parts of the city, and has turned down several job offers. 

But the court ruled that the father, Giuseppe Andreoli, who is a former 
parliamentarian and a respected Neapolitan medic, should carry on supporting 
his estranged son. ``You cannot blame a young person, particularly from a 
well-off family, who refuses a job that does not fit his aspirations. The 
parents have to pay for their upkeep,'' said the court in a verdict handed 
down earlier this week. 

Andreoli said on Friday he was shocked by the decision. 

``I feel disgust for a country that I love. It wasn't always like this,'' he 
told Reuters. 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
``MUMMY'S BOYS'' 

The ruling struck a chord in Italy where almost one in three people aged 
between 30 and 34 still live with their parents, preferring home comforts and 
mothers' cooking to the challenge of striking out alone. 

``This decision sets a dangerous precedent,'' said psychologist Gianna 
Schelotto. ``Up until the 1980s, young people wanted emancipation from their 
families even if it meant going out and cleaning dishes. Today, 30-year-olds 
still feel young and aren't prepared to make sacrifices.'' 

The growing reluctance to cut the apron strings has coincided with a falling 
birthrate, now put at less than 1.2 children per woman -- the lowest level in 
Italian history. 

``Italy is faced by a deep cultural problem. Young people enjoy a great 
quality of life and enormous freedom by staying at home. Without enormous 
incentives, why should they leave?'' said Riccardo Grassi, who works for the 
Milan IARD research institute which specializes in youth issues. 

The problem is compounded by the fact that it often takes years to complete a 
university degree in Italy, graduates' starting salaries tend to be low and, 
unlike elsewhere in Europe, the government offers little financial help to 
young parents. 
Labor Minister Roberto Maroni said on Thursday he was drafting a bill to 
offer tax cuts to newly-weds with an eye to boosting the birthrate. 

But social commentators said the appeals' court ruling went in the opposite 
direction and would encourage children to stay at home rather than go out and 
find a job or start a family. 

``Without seeking to, this (ruling) represents a pernicious obstacle to 
matrimony, which is essential to an ordered society and to the reproduction 
of the race,'' Rome's Il Messaggero newspaper thundered on Friday. 

<A HREF="http://news.findlaw.com/news/s/20020405/lifeitalyparentsdc.html">
FindLaw Legal News</A>  
http://news.findlaw.com/news/s/20020405/lifeitalyparentsdc.html