Sicily's woes during this past half century can
be mainly attributed to the USA!
The USA made a pact with the Devil (The Mafia), "feeling" that it was
necessary in order to assure the Allied landing in Sicily in 1944 would
incur
many less casualties.
(No known attempts were made to contact "Partisans/Anti Fascists" in
Sicily).
The Mafia, which had been almost eradicated under Mussolini, reemerged
with
the "blessing/payback" of the Allied invasion/occupation.
"Northern" Italy with a century old feeling of "superiority" toward
the "South",
was then able to use the Mafia control as justification for withholding
government investment in "Sicily/South" as "wasteful" on the basis
of the
perceived "corruption".
There are at least two ironies that leap out at me.
One is that the Unification of Italy in 1860-70, and the ensuing prosperity
of the "North" was ONLY made possible by the "expropriation" of the
"bulging"
Treasury of the Kingdom of Two Sicilies by the Piedmontese government,
after
which the "South" was left to whither!
Second, The Kingdom of Sicily was the ONLY European nation to DARE be
an ally of the USA in the battle against the Barbary Pirates (1800-15).
One Last Thought: Why do so many sucessful 2nd and 3rd generation European
Americans invest in the prosperity of their "mother" country, but NOT
Italians???
======================================
Thanks to Bob Massullo
SICILIANS REFUTE BAD RAP IN BRITISH MAGAZINE
ITALY DAILY
by Elisabetta Povoledo
May 5, 2002
If Sicily were a publicly traded company, its shares would have tumbled
Friday, when the respected business weekly The Economist published
an
unsympathetic article that painted a very bleak picture of the region's
economic potential.
Sicily's political and business elite immediately retorted with an
impassioned defense of local business. And they were not above throwing
a few
barbs of their own back to the British publication, which has been
unfailingly critical of Silvio Berlusconi's center-right government.
Labeling Sicily as the EU's third-world island, the Economist described
a
hostile environment where lack of water and electricity, a rigid public
administration, poor transport and the general absence of a work ethic,
easily outweighed the Mafia when it came to impeding businesses from
thriving.
"For most of its firms, the daily fight to keep upright in an inhospitable
business climate is even tougher than fending off Cosa Nostra's attentions,"
wrote the Economist, whose articles are not signed, in the edition
that hit
newsstands Friday.
President Salvatore Cuffaro of the Sicily Region, said he was surprised
and
bitter that the magazine gave such a clichéd view of the problems
in Sicily
and countered that the island was making great strides to "overcome
a
situation that had been created over years of political mismanagement."
Sicily was actually recognized as a prime investment material, he said,
citing a recent study by consulting agency KPMG, which placed Catania
at the
top of a list of cities in which to invest.
Annibale Chiriaco, of the region's young industrialist association,
said that
it wasn't the first time Sicily had been attacked using clichés
for political
objectives. "Those who use these assessments for political ends don't
realize
they are discrediting a political class that has already proven itself,"
he
said, adding that Sicily was competitive in the global marketplace
and that
articles such as the one published by the Economist ran the risk of
"aborting
these efforts and driving away resources."
Reaction from other members of the business lobby was more muted. "The
Economist can only give us industrialists the push to do better," said
Giuseppe Costanzo, the president of the Palermo industrialist's association,
who agreed that Sicilian business faced many problems, beginning with
insufficient infrastructures.
Opposition leaders have accused the government of ignoring the south
and
privileging the northern regions. During the presentation of a book
on
employment on Thursday, center-left Daisy Party leader, Francesco Rutelli,
blamed the Berlusconi government of cutting investments in the south
by 20
percent and assistance to companies by 40 percent. He pointed out that
of the
15 important infrastructures given priority by the government, only
the
bridge over the straight of Messina was in the south.
|