Scalzitti's Column for July!!!
[My Comments in Brackets]
-------------------------------------
(1) THEY'RE EVERYWHERE I GO....
[ “Bartleby” ???...Would Herman Melville do that
to us????]
(2) WHERE WERE WE?
[ Lesson to be Learned: If you don't speak up, People
can't hear you!]
(3) STAMP OF APPROVAL
[ I-A's so deprived of deserved attention, willing
to 'annoint' Kass for
'crumbs'.
Let's put Kass's Sicilian wife to work on him, to
turn him into an I-A
'crusader'.]
(4) TONY, TONY, TONY...
[A Utilitarian Happy Ending!]
--------------------------------------
MEDIAWATCH
by Jim Scalzitti
(1) THEY'RE EVERYWHERE I GO....
I thought that maybe I should just get my mind off of monitoring the
way that
we are portrayed in the media, so I went to the movies. There were
at least
three movies I wanted to see before they went to DVD, so I caught them
all in
the same weekend. They included that new English movie with Hugh Grant,
the
latest adaptation of an Oscar Wilde story, and a highbrow, arty movie
based
on a story by Herman Melville.
The last thing I expected that weekend was to be assaulted with a needlessly
ugly picture of an Italian-American character. The surprising thing,
it
should be noted, is that this assault did not come from the wholly
contemporary Nick Hornby-penned film, it was from the Melville tale.
“What?” you say, “I didn’t know Melville was the sort who would pen
an
anti-Italian story!” Well, I don’t know what Melville thought of the
Italians, but don’t go out and burn your copies of “Moby Dick” just
yet. It
turns out that Melville’s tale of “Bartleby the Scrivener” has suffered
from
some revisionist screenwriting. The worst of it is that the offense
occurred
under the watch of one of our own.
“Bartleby” the movie is generally the same story as Melville’s. It is
about
a guy who gets a very dull job in a very non-descript office, and gradually
stops doing his assigned work, telling those who give him work to do,
“I
would prefer not to.” It was an entertaining tale, if about 20 minutes
too
long, since it’s a one-joke film. In order to make it about 90 minutes
long,
the producers apparently added a character or two and a storyline that
was
not included in Melville’s story.
One of Bartleby’s officemates is named “Rocky,” and was played by Joe
Piscopo. Now, I was actually looking forward to seeing Piscopo playing
a
non-comedic role, but the experience quickly soured. Piscopo’s character
was
a lady’s man, juggling multiple long- and short-term girlfriends. That
was an
imperfection I was able to live with, but later, once Bartleby stopped
working, and his boss didn’t know what to do with him, Piscopo’s character
turns into what a review in the Austin Chronicle called “a thugish
Frank
Sinatra.” Typical dialogue for “Rocky” was something along the lines
of,
“Hey boss, you want me teach our Bartleby a little lesson?” while looking
menacingly at the title character, and grinding his fists together.
What makes this experience even worse is that “Bartleby” was co-written
and
co-produced by Catherine di Napoli. On the Bartleby Web site
(www.bartlebythemovie.com), di Napoli’s bio makes a great deal of saying
that
“she spent six months in Rome studying Italian film.” And this is what
she
learned? It also adds that she and fellow Bartleby producer Jonathan
Parker
“are collaborating on their next project.” I can hardly wait for that.
-----------------------------------------
(2) WHERE WERE WE?
A recent UCLA study on how ethnic minorities in the United States are
represented on television found that African Americans are concentrated
in
situation comedies, while other minorities are underrepresented on
the small
screen.
Among the findings were that, although Latinos make up 12.5 percent
of the
U.S. population, they comprise only two percent of the characters on
TV.
According to the study, about 30 percent of black characters had occupations
that “were not clear from the sampled episodes.” Also, “with the exception
of criminals, who accounted for three percent of all black characters,
each
of the other significant occupations suggested a middle-class to upper-class
lifestyle.”
Say what you will about the study’s findings (so, blacks are concentrated
in
comedies? what’s wrong with that?). The real story here, I think, is
that a
major university released a study on the portrayals and representations
of
select ethnic groups on television and it received news coverage across
the
board, on TV, radio and newspapers, in the days after its release.
The weird thing is that the talking heads who repeated the story really
didn’t have anything interesting to say and the study sparked no perceptible
discussion. Now if they only would have included how disproportionately
Italian Americans are portrayed as criminals on TV, then they would
have had
a story!
---------------------------------------
(3) STAMP OF APPROVAL
Chicago Tribune columnist John Kass seems to be on a mission to give
due
recognition to Antonio Meucci, the Italian man who supporters say invented
the telephone before Alexander Graham Bell laid claim to it. He’s already
commented on it once in a column, but in his June 10 column, regarding
his
recipe for cooking chicken with a beer can in it (this is not a joke
—
apparently otherwise normal people do this and brag about how good
the
chicken tastes) he complained that someone else is making money off
of his
idea.
“Some guy named Steve has come out with a quickie book about how to
grill my
famous beer-can chicken,” Kass wrote. “What’s worse, he’s charging
an
outrageous $12.95, while I’ve given it away in the paper.”
Kass, a Greek who is married to a Sicilian (as he often tells us in
his
columns), later commented, “Now I know how that Italian guy felt, Signore
What’s-His-Name, the fellow who invented the telephone before Alexander
Graham Bell ripped him off and got rich.”
Whenever the ceremony to honor Antonio Meucci is held, Kass should be
an
honored guest. While he hasn’t written full-length columns about the
guy, he
has, no doubt, introduced him to many people who might not otherwise
have
ever been aware of him.
--------------------------------------------
TONY, TONY, TONY
For your information, yes, the following is a media-related item of
interest
to Italian Americans, and no, I am not including it just to rub something
in
the faces of our New York brothers and sisters.
For most sports fans, the news on Wednesday, June 12, was all about
the L.A.
Lakers winning half as many NBA Championships as the Chicago Bulls
did in
their heyday not too long ago. But for the rest of us (no, not Mac
users, but
White Sox fans) the news of the night was that one man seemed to
single-handedly beat the mighty New York Mets. In Chicago, the top
sports
story on the late news on the NBC affiliate after the NBA game wasn’t
about
the basketball game, but about the Sox victory over the Mets. It’s
of
interest to Italian Americans, because the onscreen graphic that accompanied
the sports report was a picture of White Sox infielder Tony Graffanino,
and
the headline read, “TONY AWARDS.”
Graffanino, a utility infielder who has outperformed all the Sox regulars
both with his bat and his glove, hit one home run, drove in a couple
runs and
made some outstanding catches to prevent the Mets from scoring. This
was no
fluke, however. Graffanino is one of the few members of the Sox to
be hitting
over .300 as I write this in mid-June. I know it’s really no big deal
to hear
an Italian name mentioned on a sports report, but Tony has a not terribly
common, four-syllable name, which this particular sportscaster mentioned
at
least four times, without mispronouncing it once. I have no idea what
the guy
is like personally, but if you’re looking for positive Italian-American
role
models, Tony Graffanino is a good guy to start with. For the record,
the Mets
did score in that game; some fella named Piazza hit a home run.
---------------------------------------
Distributed with Permission, From Paul Basile, Editor
(Copyright 2002, Fra Noi News Service, a division of Fra Noi Inc.)
|